The first defined "char" as "charcoal," and two websites discussed "activated charcoal" for water filtration. However, there is a difference between activated charcoal and charcoal. Special manufacturing techniques must be applied to turn charcoal into activated charcoal. The Board therefore found that "charcoal" is not "a term that would immediately come to mind when considering Applicant's goods which make use of activated charcoal."
Applicant does not refer to "char" in its advertising, but to "activated charcoal." "A vague suggestion of a feature or characteristic of Applicant's goods is insufficient to establish mere descriptiveness."
A second definition of "char" is "a charred substance." Some webpages use "char" in the context of filtration, but they make clear that the char is further treated to create activated charcoal. "Because the char itself is not used in filtration, . . . any association of CHAR meaning 'a charred substance' in the context of Applicant's goods requires thought or conjecture."
The third definition refers to "char" as a verb meaning "to convert to charcoal or carbon usually by heat: BURN." There was no evidence of use of "char" as a verb in the context of water filtration.
And so the Board reversed the refusal to register.
The third definition refers to "char" as a verb meaning "to convert to charcoal or carbon usually by heat: BURN." There was no evidence of use of "char" as a verb in the context of water filtration.
In sum, while the term “char” has three meanings relevant to Applicant’s goods, none of them immediately describe, without thought or conjecture, a feature or characteristic of Applicant’s identified goods.
Read comments and post your comment here.
TTABlogger comment: Do you agree with the Board's decision? BTW, there's a fish called the Arctic Char. So what, you might ask.
Text Copyright John L. Welch 2021.
Labels:
0 comments:
Post a Comment